Close Menu
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • AI/Machine Learning
    • CT
    • Fluoroscopy/C-Arm
    • General Radiology
    • Interventional Radiology
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging
    • PACS/RIS/Informatics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Radiology Management
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Research News
    • Ultrasound
    • Women’s Imaging
  • E-Newsletter
  • Education
    • ARMRIT Annual Meeting
    • MRI Books
    • Webinars
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Product Directories
    • Resource Listing
    • Reprints
    • Writers’ Guidelines

Join Our Email List

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Trending
  • Extended View
  • Stretched Too Thin
  • The Real Deal on Synthetic Images
  • Station to Station
  • Fluoroscopy in Transition
  • Editor’s Note: Hot Topic
  • AI Insights: AI Tumor Segmentation When Contrast Isn’t an Option
  • On the Case
Sunday, July 26
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Gift Shop
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Radiology Today MagazineRadiology Today Magazine
Subscribe
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • AI/Machine Learning
    • CT
    • Fluoroscopy/C-Arm
    • General Radiology
    • Interventional Radiology
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging
    • PACS/RIS/Informatics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Radiology Management
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Research News
    • Ultrasound
    • Women’s Imaging
  • E-Newsletter
  • Education
    • ARMRIT Annual Meeting
    • MRI Books
    • Webinars
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Product Directories
    • Resource Listing
    • Reprints
    • Writers’ Guidelines
Radiology Today MagazineRadiology Today Magazine
Home » Is That Safe in an MRI?

Is That Safe in an MRI?

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Threads Bluesky Copy Link

By Jim Knaub
Radiology Today
Vol. 11 No. 6 P. 4

Frank G. Shellock’s e-mail led to a phone discussion and a review copy of the Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants and Devices: 2010 Edition making its way to my desk. An adjunct clinical professor at the University of Southern California and the driving force behind the Web site www.mrisafety.com, Shellock edits the annual reference manual. While the title has no snap, the book is filled with the kind of detailed information that professionals entering an MRI suite (or those sending patients there) should have in their offices. For example, this edition evaluates more than 200 aneurysm clips for safety in an MR environment. After briefly pondering the notion of more than 200 aneurysm clips, I did a quick count and found that about one half are considered “safe” in a 1.5T MR environment, while the remaining hundred or so were deemed either unsafe or conditionally safe. It’s a good thing someone writes down all this information in one place.

In addition to the clips, Shellock’s list includes evaluations of pacemakers, access ports, radioactive seed implants, and a host of other common (and uncommon) medical devices. What Shellock calls “The List” is evolving because implants and other devices are changing and MRI technology is changing. If a device is evaluated as safe in a 1.5T environment, what does that mean for a 3T environment? It means the device needs to be evaluated in a 3T environment. That testing is underway; some is included in the 2010 edition and more will be included in subsequent years’ editions.

The manual underscores the important idea that MRI safety is an ongoing, evolving process. Even if you knew everything about the topic a few years ago, you could be behind the times today. Kathy Hardy’s article on that topic appears on page 16. Also in this edition, Beth W. Orenstein writes on a catheter-based technique for imaging and evaluating plaque inside patients’ arteries—another example of how things change in imaging.
Enjoy the issue.

jknaub@gvpub.com

Department
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Editor’s Note: Hot Topic

July 7, 2026

AI Insights: AI Tumor Segmentation When Contrast Isn’t an Option

July 7, 2026

On the Case

July 7, 2026
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

E-Newsletters

A trusted resource for industry professionals, Radiology Today reports the latest news and information that matters to radiologists, radiology administrators, and technologists.

1721 Valley Forge Road #486, Valley Forge, PA 19481
Phone: 800-278-4400 or 610-948-9500
Subscriptions: 833-790-6897

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn

Subscribe

  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Radiology Today Magazine. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.