'Motion-Tracking' MRI May Predict AFib Stroke Risk
Stroke is a frequent and dreaded complication of atrial fibrillation (AFib). But predicting which of the estimated 2.2 million to 6 million Americans with AFib are at highest risk has long challenged physicians weighing stroke risk against the serious side effects posed by lifelong therapy with warfarin and other blood thinners.

Now researchers from Johns Hopkins performing sophisticated motion studies of heart MRI scans have found that specific altered function in the left atrium, one of the heart's four chambers, may signal stroke risk in those with AFib and possibly those without it. The imaging technique combines standard MRI scans with motion-tracking software that analyzes cardiac muscle movement.

Reporting recently in the Journal of the American Heart Association, researchers say the specialized tests can pave the way to both more accurate risk-gauging models and also more precise therapy among patients with the highest likelihood of stroke. The current risk-assessment guidelines underestimate that risk in about 12% of people with AFib who would benefit from prophylactic treatment with blood thinners, researchers say. At the same time, researchers add, averting overtreatment in lower-risk patients would prevent the rare but often devastating brain bleeds that occur as a side effect of blood thinners.

The study results, the research teams says, also cast doubt on the current clinical dogma that chaotic beating of the upper chambers of the heart during Am12trial fibrillation fuels the blood clot formation that causes stroke. That view, the team says, has failed to explain why many people with AFib never have strokes and why many with a history of AFib have no evidence of abnormal rhythms within a month before the stroke.

"Our research suggests that certain features of the heart's upper left chamber that are easily seen on heart MRI could be the smoking gun we need to tell apart low-risk from high-risk patients," says lead investigator and heart rhythm specialist Hiroshi Ashikaga, MD, PhD, an assistant professor of medicine and biomedical engineering at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

The investigators say just how the suppressed function and altered anatomy of the left atrium cause stroke remains unclear, but add that they have reason to believe these features reflect more sluggish blood flow that leads to clot formation and precipitates stroke.

"Our observations suggest that altered function in the left atrium of the heart may lead to stroke independently of the heart rhythm disturbance itself," says coinvestigator Joao Lima, MD, a professor of medicine and radiology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and director of cardiovascular imaging at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. "What this means is that people with compromised function in the left upper portion of the heart may be at risk for stroke, with or without atrial fibrillation."

"Maybe when it comes to stroke risk and AFib, we've been chasing the wrong guy all along," Ashikaga says. "Maybe atrial fibrillation itself is not the real culprit and dysfunction of the left atrium is the real baddie. It's a possibility we have to consider and will in an upcoming study."

The new findings are based on analysis of records of 169 Johns Hopkins patients, ages 49 to 69, with AFib who had cardiac MRIs before undergoing a minimally invasive procedure to ablate (ie, burn off) small sections of heart tissue that trigger the aberrant rhythm. Eighteen of the patients had suffered minor or major strokes prior to their ablations.

Using the enhanced motion imaging, the investigators compared images of the hearts of patients who had suffered strokes with those who had not, noticing several marked differences.

First, the left atria of patients who'd had strokes had notably reduced ability to empty out blood into the lower portion of the heart, an average of 35% per minute in patients with strokes, compared with 46% among those without strokes. In addition, the left atria were bigger and more dilated in patients who'd suffered strokes, an average volume of 52 mL/m2 in stroke patients, compared with 44 mL/m2 in those without stroke. Finally, the left atria of patients who'd suffered strokes had worse overall ability to stretch out and recoil with each heartbeat, meaning that the heart muscle in this area of the heart was not as elastic and as capable of accommodating strain. Taken together, the researchers say, these features indicate that patients who'd suffered strokes had suppressed function and slower blood turnover in this portion of their heart muscle.

The research team is next planning to test the predictive value of this imaging approach in patients both with and without AFib, follow them closely, and track their stroke risk over time.
SOURCE: Johns Hopkins Medicine