Proton therapy results in fewer side effects than traditional X-ray radiation therapy with similar cure rates for many cancer patients, according to a new study led by Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and the Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania. The findings were presented June 1 at the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual meeting in Chicago by the study’s first author, Brian C. Baumann, MD, a radiation oncologist at Washington University School of Medicine.
The study is the first major side-by-side comparison of side effects related to proton therapy and X-ray radiation therapy. It included almost 1,500 patients receiving combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for lung, brain, head and neck, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic cancers that had not yet spread to other parts of the body. Such patients receive both radiation and chemotherapy, a treatment regimen that often cures nonmetastatic cancer but also causes severe side effects—such as difficulty swallowing, nausea, and diarrhea—that reduce quality of life and can, in some cases, require hospitalization. The researchers focused their study on grade 3 adverse events, which are severe enough to require hospitalization. These can include pain, difficulty swallowing that might result in weight loss, difficulty breathing, and nausea and diarrhea severe enough to cause dehydration.
After controlling for differences between the groups, such as age and additional medical problems, the researchers found that patients receiving proton therapy experienced a two-thirds reduction in the relative risk of severe side effects within 90 days of treatment, compared with patients receiving X-ray radiation therapy. Forty-five of 391 patients receiving proton therapy experienced a severe side effect in the 90-day time frame (11.5%). In the X-ray radiation therapy group, 301 of 1,092 patients experienced a severe side effect in the same period (27.6%). Patient data on side effects were gathered as the trial was ongoing, rather than after the fact.
“Proton therapy was associated with a substantial reduction in the rates of severe acute side effects—those that cause unplanned hospitalizations or trips to the emergency room—compared with conventional photon, or X-ray, radiation for patients treated with concurrent radiation and chemotherapy,” says Baumann, an assistant professor of radiation oncology at Washington University and an adjunct assistant professor of radiation oncology at Penn. “The opportunity to reduce the risk of severe side effects for patients and thereby improve their quality of life is very exciting to me. While there have been other studies suggesting that proton therapy may have fewer side effects, we were somewhat surprised by the large magnitude of the benefit.”
The researchers also found no differences in survival between the two groups, suggesting that proton therapy was just as effective in treating the cancer even as it caused fewer side effects. Overall survival at one year for the proton therapy group was 83% of patients vs 81% for the X-ray radiation therapy group. This difference wasn’t statistically significant.
This study is the first large review of data across several cancer types to show a reduced side effect profile for proton therapy compared with X-ray radiation therapy for patients receiving combined chemotherapy and radiation. Both types of radiation therapy are approved by the FDA for cancer treatment. Protons are relatively heavy, positively charged particles that hit their target and stop. X-ray beams consist of photons, which are much smaller particles that have almost no mass, allowing them to travel all the way through the body, passing through healthy tissue on the way out.
Baumann notes that patients in the proton group had fewer side effects despite the fact that they were older—with an average age of 66—than patients in the X-ray radiation therapy group—with an average age of 61. According to Baumann, this age difference is due to a quirk of insurance. Medicare, with its minimum enrollment age of 65, covers proton therapy. But, since proton therapy is more expensive to administer than X-ray radiation therapy, most private insurers do not cover it. Baumann, who treats patients at Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, says he and his colleagues did not compare the costs of the two therapies and their associated adverse events, but they plan to in future studies.— Source: Washington University School of Medicine