Close Menu
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • AI/Machine Learning
    • CT
    • Fluoroscopy/C-Arm
    • General Radiology
    • Interventional Radiology
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging
    • PACS/RIS/Informatics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Radiology Management
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Research News
    • Ultrasound
    • Women’s Imaging
  • E-Newsletter
  • Education
    • ARMRIT Annual Meeting
    • MRI Books
    • Webinars
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Product Directories
    • Resource Listing
    • Reprints
    • Writers’ Guidelines

Join Our Email List

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Trending
  • Structured Reporting — Saying the Same Thing the Same Way
  • SNM Reporter’s Notebook
  • Breast MRI and Mastectomy — Is There a Link?
  • Digital Archiving for Mammography
  • Seven Steps to Improving Radiologist Dictation
  • Lending a Hand
  • Whole-Body Makeover
  • Next Phase
Thursday, June 18
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Gift Shop
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Radiology Today MagazineRadiology Today Magazine
Subscribe
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • AI/Machine Learning
    • CT
    • Fluoroscopy/C-Arm
    • General Radiology
    • Interventional Radiology
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging
    • PACS/RIS/Informatics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Radiology Management
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Research News
    • Ultrasound
    • Women’s Imaging
  • E-Newsletter
  • Education
    • ARMRIT Annual Meeting
    • MRI Books
    • Webinars
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Product Directories
    • Resource Listing
    • Reprints
    • Writers’ Guidelines
Radiology Today MagazineRadiology Today Magazine
Home»Issues»May 2012»Angioplasty, MS, Hope, and Science

Angioplasty, MS, Hope, and Science

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Threads Bluesky Copy Link

By Jim Knaub
Radiology Today
Vol. 13 No. 5 P. 3

What do recent reports suggesting that angioplasty of neck veins reduces symptoms in 50% to 60% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) mean? They mean controversy. That’s how it is with chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) these days. That’s how it usually is when a devastating, incurable disease meets a new treatment that shows some startling anecdotal results.

MS is an incurable, progressive, debilitating disease affecting an estimated 400,000 in the United States and 2.5 million worldwide. Interventional radiologists attending the recent Society of Interventional Radiology annual meeting presented measured, encouraging data on angioplasty for relieving symptoms in MS based on the concept of CCSVI. Some MS patients have seen tremendous symptom improvement, presumably—though nothing is proven—because the angioplasty improves blood flow out of the brain. Our article on recent data on angioplasty for CCSVI appears on page 24.

Hector Ferral, MD, reported data from 94 MS patients. In that series, 55% of patients reported symptom improvement, and 38% reported no improvement. (Seven percent were lost to follow-up.) I consider that encouraging data from early ongoing research on the topic.

Here’s what it’s up against: “Your life changes. In 30 minutes to an hour you feel completely different. I feel like my life has started again. I feel like my whole body—my mind, my shoulders, my back—has completely changed.”

This quote comes from a YouTube video in which a man identified as Costas Andreou discussed the CCSVI angioplasty he received in Bulgaria. Andreou said he struggled to walk because of weak legs and could not stand up straight before the treatment. Andreou talked about how he felt three days after treatment. I found his video in less than a minute using Google; you can be certain the MS community knows all about it. Advocacy groups are pushing for broader use of the treatment.

Ferral and others like him are working with hospital institutional review boards on to studies to learn more about CCSVI, MS, and angioplasty’s role in treatment. They hope for an investigational device exemption and clinical trials in the not-too-distant future. One objective will be to learn more about the CCSVI concept that could help doctors determine which MS patients are more likely to be helped by the procedure. It is good news, but hope doesn’t want to wait for the results of a controlled clinical trial.

Enjoy the issue.

jknaub@gvpub.com

Department
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Editor’s Note: Steps Forward

June 1, 2026

Radiation Safety: Safety Check

June 1, 2026

AI Insights: Balancing the Load

June 1, 2026
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

E-Newsletters

A trusted resource for industry professionals, Radiology Today reports the latest news and information that matters to radiologists, radiology administrators, and technologists.

1721 Valley Forge Road #486, Valley Forge, PA 19481
Phone: 800-278-4400 or 610-948-9500
Subscriptions: 833-790-6897

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn

Subscribe

  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Radiology Today Magazine. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.