Close Menu
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • AI/Machine Learning
    • CT
    • Fluoroscopy/C-Arm
    • General Radiology
    • Interventional Radiology
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging
    • PACS/RIS/Informatics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Radiology Management
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Research News
    • Ultrasound
    • Women’s Imaging
  • E-Newsletter
  • Education
    • ARMRIT Annual Meeting
    • MRI Books
    • Webinars
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Product Directories
    • Resource Listing
    • Reprints
    • Writers’ Guidelines

Join Our Email List

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Trending
  • Lending a Hand
  • Whole-Body Makeover
  • Next Phase
  • Beyond Anatomy
  • Editor’s Note: Steps Forward
  • Radiation Safety: Safety Check
  • AI Insights: Balancing the Load
  • Imaging Informatics: Connecting Silos
Thursday, June 18
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Gift Shop
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Radiology Today MagazineRadiology Today Magazine
Subscribe
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • AI/Machine Learning
    • CT
    • Fluoroscopy/C-Arm
    • General Radiology
    • Interventional Radiology
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging
    • PACS/RIS/Informatics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Radiology Management
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Research News
    • Ultrasound
    • Women’s Imaging
  • E-Newsletter
  • Education
    • ARMRIT Annual Meeting
    • MRI Books
    • Webinars
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Product Directories
    • Resource Listing
    • Reprints
    • Writers’ Guidelines
Radiology Today MagazineRadiology Today Magazine
Home»Issues»February 2017»On the Case

On the Case

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Threads Bluesky Copy Link

By Kathryn Becker; Miguel Ramirez, MD; and Alex Merkulov, MD
Radiology Today
Vol. 18 No. 2 P. 28

History

A 43-year-old woman presented for a diagnostic mammogram. She reported two right breast areas of palpable concern (marked via skin markers), one focal palpable area at 5:00/6:00 (Figure 1) and the other at 6:00 (Figure 2). There was no family history of breast cancer.

Imaging

Targeted right breast ultrasound was performed at 5:00/6:00. The 5:00/6:00 palpable lesion corresponded with an oval nonshadowing heterogeneous hypoechoic 0.6 cm mass (Figures 3 and 4). The 6:00 posterior depth palpable concern was a benign cyst (images not provided).

Mammography demonstrated an equal density 5:00/6:00 focal asymmetry at posterior depth which correlated with a nonshadowing heterogeneous hypoechoic 0.6 cm mass on concurrent targeted ultrasound. No suspicious calcifications on mammography. A typically benign palpable cyst was noted at 6:00 (images not provided).

Diagnosis

Granular cell tumor.

Discussion

Granular cell tumors are rare, usually benign neoplasms. These tumors most commonly occur in the tongue but may also occur in the breast, gastrointestinal tract, or larynx. When these tumors occur in the breast, findings in the patient’s clinical history, physical exam, mammography, and sonography can mimic those of breast malignancy.

Clinical history and physical exam often reveal a firm, painless, and palpable breast mass. The patient may have dimpling or skin retraction.

On mammography, granular cell tumors of the breast can appear as poorly defined, spiculated lesions, similar to a breast carcinoma. The lesion may also appear as a more well-defined mass.

On ultrasound, these tumors have variable appearances. The lesion can appear as a heterogeneous mass with varying echogenicity, poorly defined borders, or posterior shadowing prompting concern for breast malignancy. Conversely, they may appear as a well-circumscribed hypoechoic mass with posterior enhancement, mimicking the appearance of a complicated cyst.

Core needle biopsy or fine needle aspiration is needed for diagnosis with histologic and immunocytochemical analysis of the obtained samples. Granular cell tumors stain S100 positive, indicative of their neural crest origin.

— Kathryn Becker is a fourth-year medical student at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine.

— Miguel Ramirez, MD, is a fifth-year resident at the University of Connecticut Health Center.

— Alex Merkulov, MD, is an associate professor of radiology and the section head of women’s imaging at UConn Health.

Resources
1. Scatarige JC, Hsiu JG, de la Torre R, Cramer MS, Siddiky MA, Jaffe AH. Acoustic shadowing in benign granular cell tumor (myoblastoma) of the breast. J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6(9):545-547.

2. Irshad A, Pope TL, Ackerman SJ, Panzegrau B. Characterization of sonographic and mammographic features of granular cell tumors of the breast and estimation of their incidence. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(3):467-475.

3. Kim EY, Kang DK, Kim TH, Jung YS, Kim KS, Yim H. Granular cell tumor of the male breast: two case descriptions and brief review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(9):1295-1301.

4. Siegel JR, Sanders L, Kalisher L, Kintiroglou M. Unusual sonographic features of granular cell tumor of the breast. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18(12):857-859.

Department
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Editor’s Note: Steps Forward

June 1, 2026

Radiation Safety: Safety Check

June 1, 2026

AI Insights: Balancing the Load

June 1, 2026
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

E-Newsletters

A trusted resource for industry professionals, Radiology Today reports the latest news and information that matters to radiologists, radiology administrators, and technologists.

1721 Valley Forge Road #486, Valley Forge, PA 19481
Phone: 800-278-4400 or 610-948-9500
Subscriptions: 833-790-6897

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn

Subscribe

  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Radiology Today Magazine. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.